Is Consumer Outrage Over Reneged Grandfather Clauses Justified? [e249]

February 1, 2016

Nasir and Matt discussthe different waysthat Netflix and 24 Hour Fitness handled backing out of grandfather pricing to customers.

Full Podcast Transcript

NASIR: Welcome to our podcast where we cover business in the news and add our legal twist to that business news. My name is Nasir Pasha.

MATT: And I’m Matt Staub.

NASIR: Today, we’re covering a very interesting topic, but you’re going to have wait to see what it is.

MATT: I can see that you think subscription-based or monthly pricing or whatever you want to call it is an interesting topic.

NASIR: Well, honestly, I didn’t name the topic because I wasn’t sure exactly how to summarize the topic. I just know we get to talk about Netflix and 24 Hour Fitness.

MATT: We’ll get into the Netflix part of it first.
I guess, for people that pay or for people that have been signed up, 2014 or before that, they were paying $7.99 a month which I believe is what I pay. I’m not positive but I think that’s when I signed up. I don’t know. I don’t even know when I signed up.

NASIR: I know I used to pay $7.99 a month but I kept giving away my username and password to family and friends that I ended up using Netflix one of these days and it said that there was too many users on or something like that so I upgraded from there to where you can pay more to have access to more screens or whatever. But I’m pretty sure I was paying $7.99. I don’t know what I’m paying now. It’s probably like a billion dollars per month.

MATT: Probably not that much because I think it’s only going up to, well, the most someone was paying was $9.99 a month.

NASIR: Oh, good. I can afford that.

MATT: Yeah, that’s what the more recent people are paying. Now that I think about it, I want to say… I don’t know if it was Netflix or maybe it was somewhere else that put up a promotion somewhat recently of “sign up now and you can get this lower rate” and I’ll get to why that’s relevant but what Netflix has now come out and said is, “Anyone that’s paying $7.99 a month, it’s going to get bumped up to $9.99 a month. You know, the silver lining is we’re going to still give you two full years of that $7.99.” I guess I shouldn’t say that fully. You can stay on the $7.99 a month plan but you’re only getting standard definition. For anyone that wants to watch in HD which has got to most people, it’s going to go up to $9.99.

NASIR: So, it’s effectively a downgrade though because, with $7.99, you had access to HD, right?

MATT: Right.

NASIR: It is a downgrade.

MATT: It is definitely a downgrade. You could technically still stay on $7.99 a month, though. You just get a lesser version of what you had.

NASIR: Got it.

MATT: But they’re giving you two years before they do that so they’re giving you a little bit of notice here and it is a month to month arrangement so I guess you could still jump on the $7.99 a month for two years and then back out if you’re really upset about the $2.00 per month increase which is what, $24.00 a year?

NASIR: Approximately.

MATT: But it’s the principle of the thing and I think that’s why a lot of people are complaining about it now as, “Hey, I thought this was supposed to be a $7.99-a-month arrangement. You’re supposed to be grandfathered into this price. Why do I have to pay more for this now?” and we’re going to get into 24 Hour Fitness which might be one of the bigger culprits of this scheme but, to me, they’re giving you the two years of kind of a buffer to figure out if you want to stay on or not. I mean, that’s about as fair as you’re going to get.

NASIR: Yeah, that’s reasonable, and it’s a couple of dollars, like you said, approximately $24.00 more per year if you’re doing your math correctly. I can’t verify that but, yeah, I mean, it’s reasonable and, frankly, I’m pretty sure, without looking at the contract, I mean, Netflix is month to month and we can cancel at any time and, therefore, so can they and they can increase the price at any time. And so, when they did increase the price to $9.99 a month for new members, they could have easily done it for old members, too. But, of course, why they didn’t is because people would have been upset, you know, and there would have been more of a backlash. But I think they ease people into it. New members are paying $9.99 a month then you have people realizing that’s how much it costs and so, when you make that change, it’s not that big of a deal, even when they are making that change, like you said, they can still stick to that same price plan if they’re on a budget and, you know, the difference between standard definition and high-definition is probably not that big of a deal on smaller screens like mobile. You’ll probably notice it on TVs and so forth but, like you said, not unreasonable change.

MATT: Right. Well, I disagree with you on that. I think it is noticeable even on small screens.


MATT: But, you know, that’s neither here nor there, I guess. That’s not the point of this. What’s going to be the response for customers? We might as well just get into the 24 Hour Fitness aspect of it. If there’s anyone that wants to do a quick search of “24 Hour Fitness complaints” or just type that into Google or “24 Hour Fitness Lifetime Membership” – I think I typed it in “24 Hour Lifetime Membership” and there was something, I don’t know what site it was but it was like 1,600 reviews, a 1.1 out of 5 rating which is unheard of.

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: That’s like every single person giving you a one and a handful of people giving you a five which doesn’t even seem possible.
So, these lifetime memberships with 24 Hour Fitness…

NASIR: I assume they’re not available anymore, right?

MATT: I guess there’s different versions of this and I know you have a friend that has entered into something like this but, you know, one of my friends, this is their version of the lifetime membership, they paid I believe – it was a while back – they paid $1,000 upfront and they never had to pay a penny ever again and they had a lifetime membership to 24 Hour Fitness. Now, the problem with his was that only got him into the basic 24 Hour Fitness clubs and all these sport clubs or high-level ones, whatever the descriptions are, you know, anything other than just the barebones weights.

NASIR: You know, I asked my friend, too. He gave me some more details and he knows these numbers pretty well and I’ll tell you why.
He says, in 1996, he paid – similar to your friend – $1,000 or nearly $1,000 for a three-year contract. And then, afterwards, $49.00 per year for life after that. Since 1999, he’s effectively been paying $4.00 per month. Like you said though, this was for a particular gym and so there was another class action lawsuit for a guy that signed up for a lifetime in 1992 or something to that effect. Something similar, I don’t think he had a big down-payment but basically he makes this argument and turned it into a class action where 24 Hour Fitness created all these subcategories. I’m sure you guys have heard of it – like, these 24 Hour Sport and I don’t know what the other ones are, you’ve heard of that, right?

MATT: Yeah, and that was his thing. I think the sport version has, like I said, it’s more than just the barebones weights equipment and I think it adds a basketball court or a sauna and stuff like that or a pool. I think a pool is a big part of it.

NASIR: What’s funny is that these guys that signed up in the 90s, I mean, fitness has changed quite a bit. I mean, there’s always going to be fads but I’m sure you remember the Bo Flex Home Gym and Tae Bo – these are the things that were big in the 90s but I don’t even know what kind of gyms there were back then. I was busy in school, studying.

MATT: Yeah. Well, I don’t think the Bo Flex and all that stuff, I don’t think that’s really popular anymore. The trend in gym stuff now is Crossfit and I guess it kind of goes along with it is all the weird races and we’ve talked about that before.

NASIR: Oh, yeah, like Mud Run and stuff like that? Yeah.

MATT: It doesn’t seem like as many people are doing it and now there’s a lot of competition with those two. That industry is getting over-saturated with different things and probably legal issues, too.

NASIR: Well, anyway, sorry to digress.

MATT: You know, regardless of what the different type of lifetime membership these people have, the general complaint is “I was told or I was promised that I would only have to pay X amount for this period and then I would get a significantly reduced rate year three or year four and every year after that.” But, now, 24 Hour is coming back saying, “Yeah, we’re going to up your monthly rate. It doesn’t matter what happened previously.” I didn’t search in extreme detail but I think it says something when I try to find 24 Hour Fitness gym contract online and really can’t – even when there’s been these lawsuits. But my guess would be there’s a clause in there saying, you know, “We have the right to raise your monthly rate up to…” you know, it could have a cap on it too of up to 10 percent a month or whatever it’s going to be but there’s going to be some clause in there saying they have the right to do that or else, “Sorry about what we said before but this is what it says in your contract.”

NASIR: Yeah, I think that’s best-case scenario that they did that, but I honestly would not be surprised that they don’t have that kind of provision in there and, as a business model, like, “Okay, look, we want to expand but, if we start putting all this money in these new gyms, what about all these lifetime memberships that we gave? We’re really losing an opportunity here,” and I wouldn’t be surprised. I wouldn’t know for sure but, based upon all the complaints and how many people were affected by this – because I’m sure a lot of people signed up for these lifetime memberships – they specifically said, “Okay, these newer gyms that we’re creating, let’s create subcategories and we can just tell the member, ‘Hey, you signed up for a lifetime membership to Gym A. This is Gym B and Gym B has a pool. Gym A doesn’t have a pool. And so, it’s not fair for you to get this great rate on a gym that you didn’t pay for.’” Of course, from a consumer perspective, that doesn’t seem very fair because you’re thinking, “Well, I get a lifetime membership to 24 Hour Fitness – whether it’s 24 Hour Fitness A or 24 Hour Fitness B,” especially since those subcategories didn’t even exist at the time.

MATT: Yeah, and that’s a pretty smart – I mean, I don’t know if smart is the right word but it’s a nice way for 24 to go about it. And so, let’s say that happened to somebody, do they at least some sort of credit on their monthly rate if they want to try to go to this higher-level club and they’ve already paid this lifetime membership? I mean, I would hope they do, but I guess that there’s no requirement that they do. But good business would allow them to do that, I would think, but who knows?

NASIR: So, these agreements, these subscription agreements I should say are pretty common. We’ve talked about subscription models online quite a bit and the contracting behind those. But one thing that I think we can say for certain, you can put whatever you have in the agreement but, if the expectations don’t match from the consumer, if you’re telling them that this is a lifetime agreement and then you say that you can adjust the price at any time, you may win a breach of contract action but you’re not going to win, first of all, a popularity contest, but you may be entering into false advertising or the realm of misrepresentation, fraud, and these are some of the allegations that were made against 24 Hour Fitness. From what I can see, I haven’t been able to find an actual judgment against 24 Hour Fitness for this – not to say that it doesn’t exist – but the class actions that I’ve seen, they actually were able to settle some of these claims that these members who entered these lifetime agreements have made.

MATT: Yeah, I mean, there is a difference between telling them, “Oh, you know, this is whatever you’re going to pay. It’s never going to go up,” and then, you know, not abiding by that, there could be some misrepresentations that get brought in there later on. So, it’s not the ol’ bait and switch as I said before. There’s still avenues for these consumers that feel like they got taken advantage of, if that’s the case. But, going back to Netflix, I’m not sure what the situation was with them either. I don’t know if they were told, “You’re only ever going to pay $7.99 a month.” I don’t remember ever seeing that. They might have raised the rates to that $9.99 and said, “Oh, if you’re already paying $7.99, we’re going to keep on that,” and now they’ve decided to up it which is a different story than, “Hey, sign up now because this is the year you get locked in, that’s the rate you’re going to pay,” and then, later on, they’re going to up it. It’s a different situation.

NASIR: Yeah, and words matter. Again, you can put whatever in your agreement but, if you start using these “lifetime” or make representations or even in your marketing material, and that’s why businesses get into trouble because they’ll send a contract to their attorney and they’ll review it, they’ll revise it, and make it bulletproof. But then, it gets handed to the marketing team to actually sell the product and everything’s kind of lost from there because that marketing material doesn’t go through that legal review that it needs to and it’s very easy to fall into that trap. It reminds me, in preparing for this episode – which, of course, I prepare hours for – I think it was just yesterday or the day before, I received a WhatsApp message or notification. WhatsApp, I’m sure everyone knows is a mobile chat service, one of the most popular in the world, it’s actually owned by Facebook now. Normally, you pay a $0.99 or $1.00 annual subscription but I got this notice, a pop-up basically saying, “Congratulations! You have a lifetime membership now to WhatsApp!” I’m like, “Okay, that’s cool.” And then, literally five minutes later, it said, “Your subscription ends on July 2016.” I’m like, “Okay, maybe that first message was a mistake.” And then, maybe another twenty minutes later, I got the same congratulations lifetime membership. So, then, of course, I look it up and, apparently, it wasn’t a mistake. WhatsApp has scrapped its subscription fee.

MATT: I didn’t even know there was an annual fee. I remember when I downloaded it years ago, I remember I had to pay $0.99 but I thought that was a one-time thing. I don’t remember… well, I’m sure there was something I had to agree to and I probably had to…

NASIR: Which you didn’t read.

MATT: If it’s $0.99 a year, it’s not going to break the bank.

NASIR: But, yeah, what if it was a dollar per year and then a billion dollars the next year? You should still read your contracts.

MATT: Well, yeah, it did say it could go up that percent per year.

NASIR: Ah. It’s interesting because what if they decide six years from now to start charging for WhatsApp, right? Is that message that I received saying that I have a lifetime membership enough to create a binding contract? Probably not, but is it enough to maybe create false advertising and so forth? Again, the difference is they’re giving it for free. And so, if they change the service – you know, WhatsApp 2.0 so to speak – and then start charging for that for new features in order to access this new feature or this new upgraded version, then you have to pay for it, then we’re talking about new territory and I think they can easily do that just like 24 Hour Fitness did.

MATT: Yeah, when did they get bought out by Facebook? I know it wasn’t yesterday.

NASIR: No, it’s been a while. I think it’s been at least…

MATT: At least one year.

NASIR: Yeah, I was going to say a couple of years – at least one year, approximately two years, not more than three years, definitely not four years.

MATT: Somewhere in that range.

NASIR: Definitely not five.

MATT: Yeah.

NASIR: Ah, I could be wrong. I’m just going to look it up now because I’m probably way off.

MATT: Well, yeah, I mean, the message, did it just send you a notification?

NASIR: No, it looked like it was a little WhatsApp message. By the way, February 2014 – two years ago, almost to the exact date – plus minus one month.

MATT: Yeah, I didn’t get that message at all. It’s probably not good.

NASIR: It was in my notifications. I don’t think iPhone has the notifications but it was a notification. And then, after I swiped it away, I tried to find it again and I couldn’t find it.

MATT: Yeah. I mean, that is an interesting thing. Like you were saying, what if they want to go back and start charging people for it. I mean, you’ve already got the confusing message of kind of conflicting things and now they want to go back to charging. I mean, there’s other ways to go about charging people.

NASIR: By the way, I have to mention this because my friend just messaged me on WhatsApp to one of our friends’ group because he was talking about how people used to make fun of him for paying $1,000 initially for the gym membership and how that was a complete waste of money, you know. I mean, ’96, I mean, that’s $1,000 for a three-year contract, that was a lot and so he’s like, “Therefore, I have paid $1,833 to 24 Hour Fitness during the past twenty years equating to nearly $92.00 per year or $7.64 per month. The average fee would decrease, of course, over time in proportion.” He’s really into numbers. He’s a real estate appraiser so it kind of makes me laugh.

MATT: So, after that first three years, he’s paid the same amount every year since and they haven’t bumped it?

NASIR: Yeah, I remember I talked to you about it before because I think the 24 Hour Fitness by his home is one of those upgraded ones – like, 24 Hour Sport or whatever – but, apparently, he was allowed to go to that gym because it was the closest one to his residence. Apparently, there was some exception that they made for lifetime residents. In other words, he may not be able to go to another 24 Hour Fitness Sport in Los Angeles but he can by the one in San Diego.

MATT: Well, that’s reasonable of them, I guess. That’s a nice gesture.

NASIR: Yeah. And so, there may be some people that are upset with 24 Hour Fitness. I’m not sure, that may have been a result of the class action lawsuit or a settlement of some sort.

MATT: Based on my experiences and others with 24 Hour Fitness, it seems like something would have to be done in a lawsuit settlement for them to agree to that, and that is reasonable.

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: Yeah. I mean, I guess that’s a good deal. Every year, it’s going to get better and better because he’s going to be paying less money per year overall.

NASIR: What people don’t know is he’s only been to the gym once, though.

MATT: That would be really funny. He’s paid for twenty-something years and never gone.

NASIR: I know he goes to the gym. He’s in shape but, yeah, that would be funny if he just went once but he still brags about how great of a deal he got.

MATT: He breaks it down to the cent of how it was a good deal and he just doesn’t go at all.

NASIR: But you have to tell us the story – or at least tell everyone else – about how you got kicked out of 24 Hour Fitness. That was funny.

MATT: Oh, yeah. Well, not doing anything bad…

NASIR: Yeah, right. I don’t know about that.

MATT: So, when I first moved to Sacramento, I joined 24 Hour Fitness and they talked me into actually what I thought was a better deal but ended up being worse. Based on kind of these things, it was cheaper to sign up for a two-year contract which they always tell you to don’t get locked into these long-term deals but I knew I was going to go because I’d always gone to the gym and it was cheaper per month but he talked me into the month to month because he’s like, “Ah, no one stays at the gym for that long,” and it was like, “Oh, all right.” It was weird they were kind of talking me out of it.

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: I was a member for a couple of years and I was like, “I’m paying way too much money,” so I quit and then I went to another location with my wife because she was a member there. When you go there as a guest – I think I was technically a guest of hers – you have to fill out this paperwork and so I’m probably a good 30 or 45 minutes into being there, they heard my name over the loudspeaker and I was like, “That’s weird, did they call my name?” So, I went over there. They’re like, “Oh, you were a member here?” I was like, “No, I was a member at the one downtown. I’m just trying this one out because it’s different. I’m considering possibly joining here.” They’re like, “Well, you can’t be a guest if you’re already a member here.” I was like, “I’m just testing this one out. Still, I’m considering joining again,” because it had been at least a few months at that point. They’re like, “Well, you can’t just do this. You’re going to have to leave right now.” I was like, “Can I at least finish my workout?” They’re like, “No, you can’t.” I was like, “Okay. I at least need to tell the person that drove me here so they aren’t looking for me as I’m standing outside.” And so, they let me do that at least.

NASIR: Oh, that’s good.

MATT: Yeah, but we did have to leave.

NASIR: “Can I at least tie my shoe?” “No, you have to leave right now.”

MATT: Yeah, it’s just ridic… I mean, the thing was I wouldn’t be able to come back to that one again without joining because they keep, like I said, when you’re a guest, you have to sign into the system or fill out this paperwork. It’s a one-time thing and it’s ridiculous that they wouldn’t let me finish that workout and then I ended up joining again, months down the road.

NASIR: You ended up joining again? After they basically offended your honor and kicked you out? So, the same exact location, too?

MATT: Well, no, that was the whole thing. I wanted to have access to multiple locations and so I ended up joining a broader… I think the membership I signed up for, I could go to any of them but it was ridiculous and I wasn’t a big fan of how they handled things.

NASIR: Did you pay more or less than $7.64 per month?

MATT: Definitely more.

NASIR: Okay. So, my friend still got a better deal. I just want to confirm.

MATT: I mean, I have friends that have paid under $10.00 a month for a long time, too, because they “locked in” to these rates when they bought them through some family membership a long time ago by their parents. It’s definitely possible. I think the people that seem to be getting the raw end of the deal here are the ones that paid a lot of money upfront based on the promise it’d be less over time and now they’re getting those rates are getting raised.

NASIR: So, just a quick takeaway…

MATT: Never join a gym.

NASIR: Never join a gym. A lot of people are getting into subscription models of different sorts – whether you’re providing a service or a product or what-have-you. We’ve talked about them in the past. There are state-specific statutes that protect consumers or even businesses. We talked about the one in New York which requires notices for annual subscriptions and things like that. We’ve talked about the one in California and Illinois. All these have different provisions but one thing that is consistent amongst all of them is that they want to make sure that the consumer or the person – I should say the person signing up to this reoccurring service – is not kind of caught off-guard. They’re made aware of this and over-communicating I think is always going to be a really good deal for you in the long-term. If your business is dependent upon – I think we’ve talked about vitamin supplement companies and how they depend upon the idea that, once you sign up, it’s hard to cancel – if you’re kind of depending upon that model, you’re just asking for trouble. You know, 24 Hour Fitness, they’re a larger company. They probably made the risk-benefit analysis of doing this – that they may have to go through a lawsuit – but, over a long term, they’re going to survive and most people aren’t going to care and they’re just going to upgrade. That’s just something to keep in mind. We’ve all signed up to services where, you know, a week or two before the annual subscription gets renewed, we get a notification, “Hey, it’s going to renew soon,” and then we’ve also been involved with those companies that just renew without asking and understand how that makes us feel, right?

MATT: Yeah, particularly the ones on that latter half where, you know, they just take out money from your account every month, especially without notification. I mean, state by state, there are specific rules on how you have to go about having the consumer or the client agree to those things. You know, as a business, you’ve got to make sure that you follow those because you don’t want to get in trouble.

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: But, the more notice, the better – the general rule of thumb, I guess.

NASIR: Well, this is becoming a long episode so we better end it quickly.

MATT: Yeah.

NASIR: I think we may have to cut out your story.

MATT: That’s fine. It wasn’t that good.

NASIR: No, yeah, what I mean cut it out and make that the episode. So, that’s it – just your story.

MATT: It would be confusing for the listeners.

NASIR: All right, well, thanks for joining us, though.

MATT: Yeah, keep it sound and keep it smart.


The Podcast Where Nasir Pasha and Matt Staub cover business in the news with their legal twist and answer business legal questions that you the listener can send it to

Get Business Legal Updates

Please provide your full name.
Please provide a valid email address.
We respect your privacy, and we will never share your information. Unsubscribe at any time.
Legally Sound Smart Business cover art

Legally Sound Smart Business

A business podcast with a legal twist

Legally Sound Smart Business is a podcast by Pasha Law PC covering different topics in business advice and news with a legal twist with attorneys Nasir Pasha and Matt Staub.
Apple Podcast badge
Google Podcast badge
Spotify Podcast badge

Latest Episodes

November 21, 2023

In this episode, Nasir Pasha and Matt Staub explore the legal implications of Artificial Intelligence in the business world. They delve into the most talked-about issue of 2023: AI and its impact on the legal landscape. Although AI isn’t necessarily a new topic, it has many unanswered questions in the legal world. Nasir and Matt…

July 12, 2023

In this episode, Attorney Nasir Pasha and Attorney Matt Staub delve deep into the complexities of mass layoffs and offer valuable insights, real-life examples, and practical advice to employers grappling with the aftermath of such challenging situations. Nasir and Matt emphasize the critical importance of effective communication when executing mass layoffs. They stress the need…

January 9, 2023

As the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the globe, businesses scrambled to adapt to the new reality it presented. In this blog post, we dive into the case of Goldman Sachs, a financial services giant, to examine their response to the crisis and the lessons other businesses can learn from their return-to-office strategy. From prioritizing employee…

October 28, 2022

Full Podcast Transcript NASIR: Finally, my two favorite worlds have collided – both the law and the chess – right here at Memorial Park in Houston, Texas. Windy day. We have some background noise – ambient noise. What are the two worlds that collided? Well, Hans Neimann has sued Magnus Carlsen for defamation in one…

September 26, 2022

Through a five-round championship bout, Matt travels to Texas from California to determine which state is better for business. Will it be a knockout with a clear winner or will it go to the scorecards?

July 7, 2022

Whether you are buying or selling a business, the transaction goes through the same steps. However, they are viewed from different perspectives. Sellers may not want to fully disclose all the blind spots while Buyers will want otherwise. Nasir and Matt battle it out in this Buyer vs. Seller to determine who has the advantage!…

May 12, 2022

When it comes to Restrictive Covenants, employers are fighting to keep their company safe while employees may use them to their advantage. Keep listening to find out if the Employer or the Employee wins this battle. Round 1: Trade Secrets A company’s trade secrets encompass a whole range of information and are one of the…

February 14, 2022

The Supreme Court rejected the nation’s vaccine mandate. Businesses with 100 or more employees are NOT required to have their employees vaccinated or go through weekly testings. However, this policy remains in effect for health care facilities. In this episode of Legally Sound | Smart Business, the team sat down to discuss their thoughts on this ruling.

December 1, 2021

In this episode of Legally Sound | Smart Business by Pasha Law PC, Nasir and Matt cover the Business of Healthcare. There is more to the healthcare industry than just doctors and nurses. Many Americans have health insurance to cover their yearly needs, but most Americans are not aware of what really goes on behind…

October 12, 2021

In our latest episode, Nasir and Matt are covering the legal issues on Social Media. The average person spends most of their day on social media, whether they are scrolling for hours or publishing their own content. However, just because you publish your own content on Instagram does not equate to you owning that image….

September 28, 2021

What is a Non-Disclosure Agreement, and when do I need one? In this episode, Nasir and Matt shares why you need to use Non-Disclosure Agreements, basic facts about NDA’s, and discuss about the infamous Jenner-Woods story. Having the right Non-Disclosure Agreement in place not only protects you and your business, but it also makes the…

June 16, 2021

Covered in this episode of Legally Sound Smart Business are some typical business mistakes blunders small businesses often make and how to avoid them. Blunder #1: Copying and pasting agreements It may sound like a good idea at the time, but this blunder comes with hidden pitfalls. Having an attorney draft terms that are specific…

February 4, 2021

How you terminate an employee can make the difference between a graceful transition to avoidable negative outcomes like a dramatic exit or even a lawsuit. We gathered a panel of experts and asked them – is there a “right way” to fire an employee? We would like to thank our guests for this episode: Amr…

December 2, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has turned nearly every aspect of life on its head, and that certainly holds true for the business world. In this episode, Matt and Nasir explain how the early days of the pandemic felt like the Wild West and how the shifting legal playing field left a lot open to interpretation and…

November 16, 2020

After plenty of ups and downs, our buyer has finally closed on the purchase of their business. While we’re marking this down in the ‘wins’ column, it never hurts to review the game tape. In this final episode, our hosts, Matt Staub and Nasir Pasha, return to the deal almost a year later to reflect…

September 15, 2020

The ink is drying on the signature line and things are looking great for our buyer. After so much hard work, the finish line is in sight and the cheering within ear shot.   Though the landlord is still serving friction, things seem safe to move forward and for now, our buyer will be keeping…

July 31, 2020

Though things are coming along well, the journey would not be interesting if it was purely smooth sailing. After our buyer opens escrow, they are forced to push the closing date back when suddenly a letter from an attorney was received claiming the business, we are buying has a trade mark on the name!  Now…

June 12, 2020

With frustration at an all-time high and professionalism at an all-time low, our friend the Buyer has “had it” with the Seller and quite frankly their lack of knowledge. At present our Buyer is rightfully concerned that the latest misstep from our loose-lipped Seller will threaten not only the entire operation of the businesses but…

May 11, 2020

As we go deeper into the buying process, we start to uncover more challenges from our seller and encounter some of the wrenches they are tossing our way. When we last left off in episode three our team was knee deep in due diligence for our buyer, had already penned and signed the Letter of…

April 4, 2020

One word–interloper! When a new mysterious broker enters the transaction and starts to kick up dust, Nasir and Matt take the reins. The seller signed off on the letter of intent (see episode 2), yet this “business broker” serves only friction and challenges by refusing to send financials, whilst demanding more of a firm commitment…

April 4, 2020

Just as most stories and deals start out, everyone is optimistic, idealistic and full of hope for clear skies. It’s a perfect outlook with a perfect setup for the ups and downs yet to come. Peek further behind the curtain and into the first steps of buying a business: the letter of intent. After the…

April 4, 2020

When a savvy buyer hears opportunity knocking to purchase a prime positioned business, she decides not to go it alone and taps in the professionals to help navigate what could potentially be a fruitful acquisition. “Behind the Buy” is a truly rare and exclusive peak into the actual process, dangers, pitfalls and achievements, that can…

August 7, 2019

GrubHub is subject to two “matters of controversy” that have likely become common knowledge to business owners: “fake” orders and unfriendly microsites.

May 28, 2019

In this podcast episode, Matt and Nasir breakdown the legal issues of the subscription industry’s business on the internet. Resources A good 50-state survey for data breach notifications as of July 2018. California Auto-Renewal Law (July 2018) Privacy Policies Law by State Why Users of Ashley Madison May Not Sue for Data Breach [e210] Ultimate…

March 12, 2019

In recording this episode’s topic on the business buying process, Matt’s metaphor, in comparing the process to getting married probably went too far, but they do resemble one another. Listen to the episode for legal advice on buying a business.

December 3, 2018

Nasir and Matt return to discuss the different options available to companies looking to raise funds through general solicitation and crowdfunding. They discuss the rules associated with the various offerings under SEC regulations and state laws, as well as more informal arrangements. The two also discuss the intriguing story about a couple who raised over…

July 24, 2018

Flight Sim Labs, a software add-on creator for flight simulators, stepped into a PR disaster and possibly some substantial legal issues when it allegedly included a Trojan horse of sorts as malware to combat pirating of its $100 Airbus A320 software. The hidden test.exe file triggered anti-virus software for good reason as it was actually…

April 17, 2018

Attorneys Matt Staub and Nasir Pasha examine Mark Zuckerberg’s congressional hearings about the state of Facebook. The two also discuss Cambridge Analytica and the series of events that led to the congressional hearings, the former and current versions of Facebook’s Terms of Service, and how businesses should be handling data privacy. Full Podcast Transcript NASIR:…

March 10, 2018

The Trump presidency has led to a major increase in ICE immigration enforcement. It’s critical for business owners to both comply with and know their rights when it comes to an ICE audit or raid. Nasir, Matt, and Pasha Law attorney Karen McConville discuss how businesses can prepare for potential ICE action and how to…

February 5, 2018

New years always bring new laws. Effective January 1, 2018, California has made general contractors jointly liable for the unpaid wages, fringe benefits, and other benefit payments of a subcontractor. Nasir and Matt discuss who the new law applies to and how this affects all tiers in the general contractor-subcontractor relationship. Click here to learn…

January 2, 2018

With a seemingly endless amount of new mattress options becoming available, it is unsurprising that the market has become increasingly aggressive. As companies invest in more innovative solutions to get in front of customers, review sites, blogs and YouTube videos have moved to the forefront of how customers are deciding on their mattresses and how…

December 7, 2017

In recent months explosive amounts of high profile allegations of sexual harassment, assault, and varying acts of inappropriate behavior have transcended every sector of our professional world. With a deluge from Hollywood and politics, and the private workforce, accusations have inundated our feeds and mass media. This harassment watershed has not only been felt within…

November 16, 2017

If you are not familiar with the EB-5 program started in 1990 to give green cards to certain qualified investors in the United States, then you may not have been alone a few years ago. Currently, the EB-5 program has since exploded since its inception and now hits its quotas consistently each year. The program…

October 10, 2017

Government requests come in multiple forms. They can come in as requests for client information or even in the form of investigating your company or your employees. Requests for Client Information General Rule to Follow Without understanding the nuances of criminal and constitutional law and having to cite Supreme Court cases, any government requests for…

August 24, 2017

Nasir and Matt suit up to talk about everything pertaining to employee dress codes. They discuss the Federal laws that govern many rules for employers, as well as state specific nuances in California and other states. The two also emphasize the difficulty in identifyingreligious expression in dress and appearance, how gender-related dress codes have evolved…

June 28, 2017

Nasir and Matt discuss the life cycle of a negative online review. They talk about how businesses should properly respond, how to determine if the review is defamatory, the options available to seek removal of the review, how to identify anonymous reviewers, whether businesses can require clients to agree not to write negative reviews, and…

June 7, 2017

On this episode of the Ultimate Legal Breakdown, Nasir and Mattbreak down social media marketing withguests Tyler Sickmeyer and Kyle Weberof Fidelitas Development. They first discuss contests and promotionsand talk about where social media promotions can go wrong,when businesses are actually running an illegal lottery, and the importance of a soundterms and conditions. Next, they…

April 3, 2017

On this episode of the Ultimate Legal Breakdown, Nasir and Matt go in depth with the subscription box business. They discuss where subscription box companies have gone wrong(4:30), the importance of a specifically tailored terms and conditions(6:30), how to structure return policies (11:45), product liability concerns (14:45),the offensive and defensive side of intellectual property (19:00),…

February 1, 2017

Nasir and Matt discuss the suit against Apple that resultedfrom a car crashed caused by the use of FaceTime while driving. They also discuss howforeseeable use of apps can increase liability for companies. Full Podcast Transcript NASIR: Hi and welcome to Legally Sound Smart Business! I’m Nasir Pasha. MATT: And I’m Matt Staub. Two attorneys…

January 5, 2017

The guys kick in the new year by first discussing Cinnabon’s portrayal of Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia soon after her death, as well as other gaffes involving Prince and David Bowie. They alsotalk about right of publicity claims companies could be held liable for based on using someone’s name or likeness for commercial gain.

December 22, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the recent incidentat a Victoria’s Secret store where the store manager kicked out all black women after one black woman was caught shoplifting. They then each present dueling steps businesses should take when employees are accused of harassment.

December 8, 2016

Nasir and Matt return to talk about the different types of clients that may have outstanding invoices and how businesses can convert unpaid bills to getting paid.

November 10, 2016

After a long break, Nasir and Matt are back to discuss a Milwaukee frozen custard stand that is now revising it’s English only policy for employees. The guys also discuss how similar policies could be grounds for discrimination and what employers can do to revise their policies.

October 6, 2016

The guys discuss the new California law that allows actors to request the removal of their date of birth and birthdays on their IMDB page and why they think the law won’t last. They also discuss how age discrimination claims arise for business owner.

September 29, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the racial discrimination claims surroundingAirbnb and how it’s handled the situation. They also discuss some practical tips for businesses experiencing similar issues.

September 8, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss whyAmazon seller accounts are getting suspended and banned without notice and how business owners can rectify this situation through a Corrective Action Plan.

August 25, 2016

Nasir and Matt talk about the accusations surroundingfashion giant Zararipping off the designs of independent artists like Tuesday Bassen and howsmaller companies can battle the industry giants.

August 18, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss Brave Software’s ad replacing technology that has caught the eye of almost every national newspaper and has a potential copyright infringement claim looming. They also welcome digital marketing expert Matt Michaelree to speak on the specifics of what Brave is attempting to do and whether it has the answers moving forward.

July 28, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Gretchen Carlson against Fox CEO Roger Ailes. They also talk aboutthe importance of sexual harassment training and properly handling such allegations in the office.

July 15, 2016

Nasir and Matt talk about the changes at Starbucks that have led to many disgruntled employees and customers.

We represent businesses.
That’s all we do.

Oh, and we love it.

We love our work. We love reviewing that lease for your new location. We thrive on closing that acquisition that nearly fell through. We’re fulfilled when we structure a business to grow, raise capital, and be legally protected.

We focus on developing close relationships with our clients by being like business partners. A partner who provides essential, personalized, proactive legal support.

We do all of this without utilizing the traditional billable hour model. You pay for the value we bring, not the time spent on calls, emails, and meetings.

Our team is made up of attorneys and staff that share these values and we are retained by clients who want the same.

Pasha Law PC operates in the states of California, Illinois, New York, and Texas.

Meet Our Team

Fractional General Counsel Services

Pasha Law Select offers the expertise of a high-end general counsel legal team for every aspect of your business at a fixed monthly rate. Pasha Law Select is deliberately designed to allow our legal team to be proactive, to anticipate, and to be comprehensive in serving our clients. To be great lawyers, we need to know our clients. We can’t know our clients unless we represent a select number of clients in the long-term. This is Pasha Law Select.

Learn More