How Starbucks Turned Coveted Employer to Employee Complaints [e274]

July 15, 2016

Nasir and Matt talk about the changes at Starbucks that have led to many disgruntled employees and customers.

Full Podcast Transcript

NASIR: Welcome to our podcast where we cover business in the news and add our legal twist.
My name is Nasir Pasha.

MATT: And I’m Matt Staub.

NASIR: And we are talking about our second favorite food item, I would say, right? After pizza. Would you say? Coffee.

MATT: Is that a food?

NASIR: No, uh… that’s true.

MATT: I guess you could freeze it and then eat it, but it seems more like a beverage.

NASIR: Well, you know what I mean – at least we talk about it. I know you and I tend to talk about coffee a lot for some reason, too. It seems like it comes up. I don’t know if it’s on the podcast or otherwise. Or we’re just happy to be drinking coffee at a coffee shop.

MATT: Well, it’s possible. I mean, I don’t like Starbucks – which is what we’re going to talk about today – and I think I’ve mentioned that many times how it’s more of a convenience. Basically, if I need coffee and it’s the only option available, that’s the only time I go there. Even when people want to meet at Starbucks, I’m always reluctant and try to go somewhere else.

NASIR: Try to go somewhere else.

MATT: I don’t really necessarily try. I mean, now, I oftentimes just suggest where we should go.

NASIR: It’s not that I don’t like Starbucks nor do I like it. it’s just that I have had great coffee and there’s a difference but I’m also very tolerable to different degrees of quality.

MATT: Yeah, that’s the thing. I will say, I mean, I only drink iced coffee.

NASIR: That makes a big difference.

MATT: Their cold brew that they’ve had this last year – maybe more than that – is actually not bad. I’ll give them that.

NASIR: Okay, we’ll give them that.

MATT: Yeah, I can drink that. I don’t drink hot drinks so maybe that’s the problem.

NASIR: Maybe they’ll be a successful company now that they have some good iced beverages.

MATT: Yeah, I was looking up the numbers for how many stores they have. We can get to that in a bit.

NASIR: How many stores do they have?

MATT: More than 23,000 in 2015.

NASIR: Wow.

MATT: Looks like about half of that…

NASIR: Half of them are right next to each other.

MATT: They’re on the same block, basically.

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: About half of that looks like to be US locations but that number is a year older. I don’t know. It’s somewhere in there. But it’s quite a bit, obviously.
Let’s get into this.
First, it all kind of stems from this – I assume it’s a barista who started this post – basically saying the morale at Starbucks amongst the people working there is at a low – maybe an all-time low – or at least it’s sinking because a slew of issues, the first of which being the hours that the baristas are working there. I think it’s well-documented that Starbucks offers benefits to its employees which I think has been a huge selling point for a long time now. It’s something they’ve gotten a lot of praise for. But, if you work there for the requirement to get those benefits or you have to work at least 20 hours a week so obviously the workers want to do that, but I would guess that most of the people working there probably see this as a full-time job just because, if you’re working a minimum 20 hours a week during the day, I mean, it’s tough to work two part-time jobs – just from a logistics standpoint – to make it all sort out.
The problem that it looks like a lot of these workers are having are it’s very difficult to work more than 25 hours a week there based on the scheduling that’s been done in recent months or I don’t know how long it’s been going on but that seems to be the case.

NASIR: I think for a little bit now.
And so, one of the reasons we’re talking about this is because this barista – like you were saying – Jaime Prater, he started this campaign on this website. I’ve never heard of it. it’s called coworker.org and it’s basically an open letter to Starbucks where you can get multiple signatures. Right now, they have 9,145 signatures of basically this letter explains kind of some of the grievances they have. Also, some of these employees give reasons as to why they’re signing. It’s actually pretty interesting. I’ll just read a couple here.
The first is McKenna S. McKenna S, if you’re listening, shout-out to you.
“As a shift supervisor, I have maybe a half to two-thirds the staff I need and we’re all extremely overworked and overwhelmed. Then, I’m told that we’ve over on labor. Mobile orders have increased sales and created more need for labor.” And that’s true. I know now, when I order I do that mobile ordering which is pretty cool. “Yet, the company is cutting labor. It creates a vicious cycle without adequate staffing. We are unable to process transactions quickly enough to earn the labor we have. The nightmare needs to end or a lot of great talent will move on.”
Another one I thought was interesting, this is from Preston J. Shout-out to him.
“This will have been my fourth year working as a barista. I have ‘fallen in like’ with my work at Starbucks because, if you’re intentional, you can really excel at it. The fact that experience doesn’t have monetary value really soured my view of the company.” What he’s referring to is I guess they were given one or two raises a year on average and that has decreased to once a year which, frankly, that’s not uncommon in the industry.

MATT: Right.

NASIR: But, if that’s true that somehow experience doesn’t equal to money value, then of course that makes sense that an employee would have agreements for that.

MATT: What I’m trying to decide if these workers, these people, are just complaining or if they have a legitimate gripe but it’s probably somewhere in the middle.

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: My view is you work at Starbucks, on one hand, they’re getting these benefits. They’re guaranteed a minimum 20 hours a week which at least that’s some work and they have the benefits. But I do understand their pain and the complaining in this and that.
Yeah, if you’re only working 25 hours a week which is barely over the minimum to get the benefits, it is going to be difficult to pay all of your bills because (1) you’re not working a full 40 hours per week and (2) when you’re working 25 hours at one job, you’re going to have to find another job to give you another what? 15 to 20 hours and allow for flexibility in your scheduling and working two jobs at once. We saw how that worked for Michael Scott at The Office when he was trying to work two jobs at once.

NASIR: That was an epic failure.

MATT: Yeah, it didn’t work well. And so, I do understand why they’re complaining about it. I don’t know. I’m kind of in the middle. I don’t know your take. There’s more to it which we’ll get to discussing but I don’t know if you have a different take than I do.

NASIR: They’re a profitable company and they’re actually doing pretty well. And so, I do like the idea of really rewarding workers and one thing that people do like about Starbucks that I know for certain is that people like the quality of service. Being able to go into a coffee shop that you go to regularly and they know your name, they know your order, I’ve heard a lot of people that develop those kind of relationships with their baristas. But I do hear, just from my personal perspectives hearing people not having the same experience that they used to have with Starbucks and it is starting to lose a little bit of that shine that it may have had in the past.

MATT: Yeah, I’m looking through what they call their special blend. What was the name? Yeah, special blend – all the different benefits and paid offers. It’s quite a long list that they have on here. I mean, you have your base pay, bonuses, benefits, 401K pay, stock, purchase plan, perks for partners for higher level people. That’s quite a bit. In that industry, it’s going to be difficult to find something as good as that.

NASIR: I agree. And so, like, they may already be beating – as far as remaining competitive – they already have some great aspects to them. First of all, a lot of companies don’t start their benefits at 20 hours. Sometimes, it’s higher. Frankly, unless there’s a law requiring certain benefits, you don’t have to provide those and you can change it however you want. They also mention that. For example, Starbucks doesn’t provide sick leave unless it’s required. As we know, in California, it is and in certain cities around the country it also has specific requirements. Those kinds of things may not meet its competition but, if they’re all part-time workers, then maybe. Of course, the fact that they’re pushing people to get into part-time and below 20 hours, obviously, that’s a cost saving for them and that’s frankly a common tactic by many employers.

MATT: Yeah, the change from two raises a year to one, I don’t see any problem with that. Like you mentioned previously, I think that’s more than fair.
One comment that this person said I have issue with, “Starbucks is more profitable than it’s ever been. US revenues were up 12 percent in the first three months of 2016. I’m not seeing that. My hours are continuing to be cut back. That’s the frustration; that’s where people see the disconnect.”
Doesn’t that make perfect sense if there’s less work?

NASIR: Yeah.

MATT: To me, that makes exact sense based on if they’re more profitable because there’s less labor hours. But I don’t know…

NASIR: True. And so, in a way, I think the barista is basically – or I think they’re saying – that they should get a cut in that. They should somehow be rewarded from that revenue. But you’re right, it seems as though these kinds of cost changing measures is what is increasing the revenue and Starbucks is a publicly traded company, I believe so. I think they’re traded on the NASDAQ, yeah.

MATT: Yeah, it was SBUX.

NASIR: SBUX?

MATT: I’m trying to remember.

NASIR: That sounds right to me. Yeah, it is.
I mean, they produce dividends and their dividends have been going up at pretty much every year about a cent or two. You’re right. they seem to be doing well and it may have something to do with the fact that they’re making some cost changes.
The thing is, we know that Starbucks in general has been hurt in the recession. They definitely pulled back some of their stores and they’ve also pulled back in certain regions. They’re definitely not expanding as they used to be. I know, just in Houston, it’s ridiculous. You have some of the busiest Starbucks in Houston are right across from each other. That’s just how the market is. It’s definitely still popular.

MATT: I was looking at the different things here, it looks like they are continuing to grow after a few years of kind of plateauing in terms of adding new stores or losing them, but it could be some other larger issues at play. I guess, by whatever ranking systems used for customer satisfaction, they’ve dropped in that or dripped – actually that doesn’t make sense.

NASIR: No, it sounds right.

MATT: They’ve closed… I forget they had these Teavana Tea Bars.

NASIR: Oh, that’s right.

MATT: And its standalone bakery locations. Of course, there’s some lawsuits – a lawsuit accusing them of underfilling its lattes.

NASIR: Did we mention that? I forgot if we talked about it or we considered talking about that. That was an interesting…

MATT: It could just be people asking for room. That’s just a common thing. Me, personally, the coffee shop I go to, oftentimes, they don’t fill it all the way up. Like I mentioned before, I get iced coffee. People put something in it. I don’t and I don’t really care.

NASIR: No, but this is an issue of quality control. I have heard people complain about them not filling it to the top or what-have-you. That’s what this whole lawsuit is about. Again, these kinds of things may have something to do with the fact that maybe they’re starting to skim on the labor force and so the quality of the workforce isn’t as good as it used to be or they’re overworked or what-have-you and mistakes happen.

MATT: There’s also another complaint about too much ice in the cold drinks.

NASIR: Which you can ask for no ice or low ice or whatever.

MATT: I mean, it could be these greater issues at play. You mentioned towards the beginning of it’s a shift in how they’re going about doing business – maybe some cost cutting. It just happens when businesses, especially ones of Starbucks’ stature and how many locations they have, I mean, sometimes, you have to do certain things in order to keep growing. They’ll be fine with profitability, it looks like, but it’s just the change that needed to be made. I mean, to me, I know the company culture has always been important to them but I think the people, the baristas will continue to work there – one reason being that benefits package – and, if they quit, other people will get slided in and continue to work there. I mean, I don’t know how to make… I can make a regular black coffee but I don’t know how to make any of the other things, but I can imagine, if I had trained for a week, I could probably make all of the drinks that they make there. I have no idea how to do it right now.

NASIR: Yeah, and not to minimize their work, I’m sure it doesn’t take that long to train. I bet you they do have some sort of turnover. There’s not that many types of people that can work part-time. You’ll have more students, more of those that are just entering entry-level workforce people, individuals that need a job or are doing something else otherwise. And so, those types of workers do tend to have more turnaround.

MATT: Yeah, and they had this college achievement plan.

NASIR: Yeah, exactly. I think we covered that, too. I think they were going to pay for tuition or something like that. It was not quite tuition. What was it? I can’t remember. I think we covered it, right?

MATT: Yeah, I think we did as well. To me, they’re doing some things now but it seems like they do care about their employees.

NASIR: I agree. I think they do a lot more than what most companies do, but you can definitely see that there is some cost savings efforts. I mean, they just changed their loyalty program. The only reason I know about this – that people are upset about it – is because my wife complained as well. Anyone who goes to Starbucks and participates in their rewards program knows about this. By the way, if I’m wrong, please correct me because I’m probably going to mess it up but this is my understanding. Before, you would go to Starbucks, whether you spent a dollar or $50.00, you would get a star and you’d collect a certain number of stars – whatever it was, it’s like ten or whatever.

MATT: I think it was twelve. I’m reading this. According to this, it was twelve.

NASIR: Okay, twelve. Then, you would get a free drink. For example, if you were going in there and you were getting a drink and maybe you have some pastry or a sandwich or whatever, what my wife would do – and what many people would do because they understand and they expect it – is you would actually separate the transactions so technically it would be more than one visit. With two items, you would get two stars and two transactions and that’s how you’d build up your stars. If you get a certain number of stars, then you get a gold card and somehow you’re the greatest person in the world. And so, there’s other benefits. That’s how it used to be.
Now, I remember when this happened because I started looking at their terms of service, how they actually managed to do this, but they did change the rewards program and obviously since there’s not really a contract, you didn’t really lose what you already had but they did change how you gained these stars. Basically, it’s based upon the dollars amount that you spend.
Before, whether you spent $2.00 on a coffee or $10.00 on a coffee – I don’t know how much the most expensive one is – you would get one star. Now, basically, one dollar equals one point or something to that effect. To get a free drink, you basically have to spend about $62.00 or so.

MATT: Yeah, I think it might be two stars per dollar spent, 125 point, roughly $62.00 which is a little over $5.00 for twelve visits. I mean, I get the most basic thing there. Well, maybe not the normal Starbucks but I’ve paid $5.00 for a coffee before – maybe that was probably in Vegas or something.

NASIR: I guess that’s an 8 percent discount. That’s not crazy. That’s not bad.

MATT: Yeah, I get why people are upset. Obviously, people were exploiting the rewards system which is fine. I have no problem with people doing that. It’s the way it’s set up so they have to shift and change, but it’s not that much different. This isn’t Southwest Airlines where it used to be – I don’t know if you remember the old rapids rewards – it was like eight flights and you get one free. Now, it’s like spend 100,000 and you get a free flight so it’s vastly different from what it used to be. To me, twelve visits versus $62.00 over twelve visits isn’t that big of a difference. I can see why people are upset about it. I mean, I’m fine with both sides in this situation and I don’t go to Starbucks so…

NASIR: Well, according to Starbucks – and this is interesting, too – I mean, this has to do with any time you have any kind of rewards programs and rewards programs, don’t take them lightly. I know even small shops have those cards where you stamp them or whatever but then there’s always a transition period when you get rid of that program, if it’s temporary, for example, you have to allow some time period where people can still use those stamps and so forth. So, there’s some regulations that come with that.
But, anyway, Starbucks’ response to kind of the blowback was kind of interesting because it’s their position that the new program pretty much reflects it’s actually somehow better for the customer. They say somehow it reflects the number one request we heard from members, more stars awarded based on what you buy, and then say that, if customers simply continued to engage as they currently do instead of engaging more as we believe they will, the vast majority of customers will earn just as many rewards as fast as they would have before.

MATT: That’s easy to prove. Just look at your rewards customers. If they’re spending more than the $5.00 in change per visit, then they’re benefiting from this new reward system. If they’re spending under it, they’re not. That’s really all it is.

NASIR: That’s your perspective. JDubs on Twitter says…

MATT: I was going to read that one, too. It was hilarious.

NASIR: Oh, you were?
“That is such a lie! Don’t spin it like it’s customer-based. BS! It’s corporate greed based.”

MATT: I was going to say, “Yeah, @BigJDubs had a problem with this corporate greed.”
To me, this is consumer greed but that’s fine.

NASIR: Well, @LindsayMills also said, “Starbucks rewards program changes are complete BS in my humble opinion.”

MATT: Just her opinion, it wasn’t a humble opinion.

NASIR: Ah, yeah, I missed the acronym. IMO.

MATT: Just real quick, I want to hear your take on this. I’ve never done it and I get kind of annoyed when people do it sometimes. It just depends on the situation but what do you think of people that have a bad experience and then immediately will just tweet at the company complaining about their experience in hopes to get a free whatever?

NASIR: It’s a good question for me because I’ve gone through phases where I fight to the teeth for every little stupid thing. I don’t do it publicly on Twitter or Facebook. That seems a little weird to me. But, honestly, if you do have a bad customer experience and you call and you just explain very calmly, you know, depending upon the company, nine out of ten times, they will give you something for free.

MATT: Yeah.

NASIR: In a way, I feel like, in the past, I felt like I had more time back then, now I feel like I don’t know what I’ll be thinking but, in the past, it’s like it made sense to go through that because, you know, you feel vindicated in a way you felt that you were somehow treated incorrectly and so there’s some kind of remedy to that and most companies – most good-sized companies – will be very responsive. Everything from if you had a bad food experience to even airlines I’ve had issues with. If you kind of run up the line with it, even with the ones that are notoriously difficult to work with, they’ll eventually give in and provide you with some positive response.

MATT: To me, I have the philosophy that it all just kind of evens out. If I go to a restaurant or pick up get-to-go and they forget something, it’ll even out because I’ll go some other time and get something extra.

NASIR: No, that never happens. By the way, if I do get the wrong order, I just call the manager – and this is a standard in every restaurant, this is some advice for everybody – if you get a bad order, just call the manager – the same day is better – and they’ll say, “Oh, when you come in, we’ll give you a gift card.” I’ve done it many times. As you guys know, you go through a drive-thru – a drive-thru I haven’t done in a while but – like a carry-out or whatever, you open it up and you get something completely wrong, you’re already home. That can be frustrating, especially with people that have dietary restrictions. That’s where it’s come up for me. That’s kind of a huge annoying issue, you know. Anyway…

MATT: You’re wrong about this because I’ve had countless times where I’ve gotten something free by accident. I’m not joking – I can’t even count the number of times that’s happened in my life.

NASIR: I cannot count them either because I can’t think of one time that it’s happened. Oh, sometimes, I order fries and you get an extra onion ring, is that what you mean?

MATT: No, but that’s happened to me before as well.

NASIR: That’s happened to you before, too. By the way, usually, typically, when you get any type of compensation or gift card or whatever, it’s usually for more than just the item that you’ve lost and they also compensate you for you know…

MATT: Oh, here you go, you love fish tacos. There’s this one place my wife and I go to, one time, we both ordered the fish tacos so we got two orders. We got our thing and they gave us three orders. We just got a free order of fish tacos which you would have loved because that’s what you like.

NASIR: Yeah, I do enjoy fish tacos. So, what are you saying? So, you’re never going to complain. You’re just hoping that thigs are going to even out in the long run? That’s not a bad approach, I suppose – less stressful.

MATT: If there was a way to go back and I could track the number of times that I lost money on something as opposed to gained, I think my gains exceed my losses. I think it’s fine.

NASIR: I’m surprised. I wouldn’t say that myself.

MATT: I could be wrong as well.

NASIR: I’d honestly like to hear some other third-party perspective if you guys have any opinion on that because I have the opposite opinion but that’s fine.

MATT: Good.

NASIR: Sauce versus crust – classic.
Anyway, Starbucks, generally, they’re doing what they do. Some of these things are so common in the corporate world. I mean, I’ve had these conversations regarding benefits and cutting workforce and we’ve talked about it with the new minimum wage for exempt workers, right? We talked about one of the results of that change. Just as a reminder, through executive order or through the Department of Labor, they issued minimum wage for exempt status. That means exempt from overtime and things like that. One of the ways that companies may try to change or try to avoid paying overtime is to have those workers work part-time or less than 40 hours a week and then hire another worker and that may happen and that may also have an unintended effect where workers may say, “Well, working less than 40 hours a week, then you’re not a full-time employee under our standard. You don’t get the same kind of benefits,” and that happens, too.

MATT: Yeah.

NASIR: By the way, this is kind of a misunderstanding. A lot of people think that full-time is defined by 20 hours or more. The reality is it depends upon what we’re talking about because what’s the significance of whether you’re a full-time and part-time? Often, it’s benefits and we’re talking about benefits. That distinction of what’s considered full-time may be employer-specific. Some employers may say you only get health benefits or certain benefits – sick pay or vacation pay – depending upon local rules or whatever if you work 30 hours or more or 35 hours or more. And so, there’s really no standard in that respect.
Now, there are other implications like, for example, there is FTE, there is full-time equivalent so all these do come into play and there are some kind of standards of what is considered full-time or part-time under certain statutes but, generally, there’s no standard rule for that definition. Just a little tidbit there.

MATT: People that are still listening, that’s some good advice.

NASIR: Yeah, I stopped listening myself. That’s fine.

MATT: Ah. Well, this is our 4th of July episode I guess.

NASIR: Hopefully. Hopefully that’s when it comes out.

MATT: Well, it’s not going to come out on the 4th of July.

NASIR: Yeah, yeah, it won’t come out on the 4th.

MATT: Yeah.

NASIR: Anyway, all right, thanks for joining us.

MATT: Yeah, keep it sound and keep it smart!

Legally Sound | Smart Business

By

The Podcast Where Nasir Pasha and Matt Staub cover business in the news with their legal twist and answer business legal questions that you the listener can send it to info@legallysoundsmartbusiness.com.

Get Business Legal Updates

Please provide your full name.
Please provide a valid email address.
We respect your privacy, and we will never share your information. Unsubscribe at any time.

Legally Sound Smart Business

A business podcast with a legal twist

Legally Sound Smart Business is a podcast by Pasha Law PC covering different topics in business advice and news with a legal twist with attorneys Nasir Pasha and Matt Staub.

Latest Episodes

February 4, 2021

How you terminate an employee can make the difference between a graceful transition to avoidable negative outcomes like a dramatic exit or even a lawsuit. We gathered a panel of experts and asked them – is there a “right way” to fire an employee? We would like to thank our guests for this episode: Amr…

December 2, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has turned nearly every aspect of life on its head, and that certainly holds true for the business world. In this episode, Matt and Nasir explain how the early days of the pandemic felt like the Wild West and how the shifting legal playing field left a lot open to interpretation and…

November 16, 2020

After plenty of ups and downs, our buyer has finally closed on the purchase of their business. While we’re marking this down in the ‘wins’ column, it never hurts to review the game tape. In this final episode, our hosts, Matt Staub and Nasir Pasha, return to the deal almost a year later to reflect…

September 15, 2020

The ink is drying on the signature line and things are looking great for our buyer. After so much hard work, the finish line is in sight and the cheering within ear shot.   Though the landlord is still serving friction, things seem safe to move forward and for now, our buyer will be keeping…

July 31, 2020

Though things are coming along well, the journey would not be interesting if it was purely smooth sailing. After our buyer opens escrow, they are forced to push the closing date back when suddenly a letter from an attorney was received claiming the business, we are buying has a trade mark on the name!  Now…

June 12, 2020

With frustration at an all-time high and professionalism at an all-time low, our friend the Buyer has “had it” with the Seller and quite frankly their lack of knowledge. At present our Buyer is rightfully concerned that the latest misstep from our loose-lipped Seller will threaten not only the entire operation of the businesses but…

May 11, 2020

As we go deeper into the buying process, we start to uncover more challenges from our seller and encounter some of the wrenches they are tossing our way. When we last left off in episode three our team was knee deep in due diligence for our buyer, had already penned and signed the Letter of…

April 4, 2020

One word–interloper! When a new mysterious broker enters the transaction and starts to kick up dust, Nasir and Matt take the reins. The seller signed off on the letter of intent (see episode 2), yet this “business broker” serves only friction and challenges by refusing to send financials, whilst demanding more of a firm commitment…

April 4, 2020

Just as most stories and deals start out, everyone is optimistic, idealistic and full of hope for clear skies. It’s a perfect outlook with a perfect setup for the ups and downs yet to come. Peek further behind the curtain and into the first steps of buying a business: the letter of intent. After the…

April 4, 2020

When a savvy buyer hears opportunity knocking to purchase a prime positioned business, she decides not to go it alone and taps in the professionals to help navigate what could potentially be a fruitful acquisition. “Behind the Buy” is a truly rare and exclusive peak into the actual process, dangers, pitfalls and achievements, that can…

August 7, 2019

GrubHub is subject to two “matters of controversy” that have likely become common knowledge to business owners: “fake” orders and unfriendly microsites.

May 28, 2019

In this podcast episode, Matt and Nasir breakdown the legal issues of the subscription industry’s business on the internet. Resources A good 50-state survey for data breach notifications as of July 2018. California Auto-Renewal Law (July 2018) Privacy Policies Law by State Why Users of Ashley Madison May Not Sue for Data Breach [e210] Ultimate…

March 12, 2019

In recording this episode’s topic on the business buying process, Matt’s metaphor, in comparing the process to getting married probably went too far, but they do resemble one another. Listen to the episode for legal advice on buying a business.

December 3, 2018

Nasir and Matt return to discuss the different options available to companies looking to raise funds through general solicitation and crowdfunding. They discuss the rules associated with the various offerings under SEC regulations and state laws, as well as more informal arrangements. The two also discuss the intriguing story about a couple who raised over…

July 24, 2018

Flight Sim Labs, a software add-on creator for flight simulators, stepped into a PR disaster and possibly some substantial legal issues when it allegedly included a Trojan horse of sorts as malware to combat pirating of its $100 Airbus A320 software. The hidden test.exe file triggered anti-virus software for good reason as it was actually…

April 17, 2018

Attorneys Matt Staub and Nasir Pasha examine Mark Zuckerberg’s congressional hearings about the state of Facebook. The two also discuss Cambridge Analytica and the series of events that led to the congressional hearings, the former and current versions of Facebook’s Terms of Service, and how businesses should be handling data privacy. Full Podcast Transcript NASIR:…

March 10, 2018

The Trump presidency has led to a major increase in ICE immigration enforcement. It’s critical for business owners to both comply with and know their rights when it comes to an ICE audit or raid. Nasir, Matt, and Pasha Law attorney Karen McConville discuss how businesses can prepare for potential ICE action and how to…

February 5, 2018

New years always bring new laws. Effective January 1, 2018, California has made general contractors jointly liable for the unpaid wages, fringe benefits, and other benefit payments of a subcontractor. Nasir and Matt discuss who the new law applies to and how this affects all tiers in the general contractor-subcontractor relationship. Click here to learn…

January 2, 2018

With a seemingly endless amount of new mattress options becoming available, it is unsurprising that the market has become increasingly aggressive. As companies invest in more innovative solutions to get in front of customers, review sites, blogs and YouTube videos have moved to the forefront of how customers are deciding on their mattresses and how…

December 7, 2017

In recent months explosive amounts of high profile allegations of sexual harassment, assault, and varying acts of inappropriate behavior have transcended every sector of our professional world. With a deluge from Hollywood and politics, and the private workforce, accusations have inundated our feeds and mass media. This harassment watershed has not only been felt within…

November 16, 2017

If you are not familiar with the EB-5 program started in 1990 to give green cards to certain qualified investors in the United States, then you may not have been alone a few years ago. Currently, the EB-5 program has since exploded since its inception and now hits its quotas consistently each year. The program…

October 10, 2017

Government requests come in multiple forms. They can come in as requests for client information or even in the form of investigating your company or your employees. Requests for Client Information General Rule to Follow Without understanding the nuances of criminal and constitutional law and having to cite Supreme Court cases, any government requests for…

August 24, 2017

Nasir and Matt suit up to talk about everything pertaining to employee dress codes. They discuss the Federal laws that govern many rules for employers, as well as state specific nuances in California and other states. The two also emphasize the difficulty in identifyingreligious expression in dress and appearance, how gender-related dress codes have evolved…

June 28, 2017

Nasir and Matt discuss the life cycle of a negative online review. They talk about how businesses should properly respond, how to determine if the review is defamatory, the options available to seek removal of the review, how to identify anonymous reviewers, whether businesses can require clients to agree not to write negative reviews, and…

June 7, 2017

On this episode of the Ultimate Legal Breakdown, Nasir and Mattbreak down social media marketing withguests Tyler Sickmeyer and Kyle Weberof Fidelitas Development. They first discuss contests and promotionsand talk about where social media promotions can go wrong,when businesses are actually running an illegal lottery, and the importance of a soundterms and conditions. Next, they…

April 3, 2017

On this episode of the Ultimate Legal Breakdown, Nasir and Matt go in depth with the subscription box business. They discuss where subscription box companies have gone wrong(4:30), the importance of a specifically tailored terms and conditions(6:30), how to structure return policies (11:45), product liability concerns (14:45),the offensive and defensive side of intellectual property (19:00),…

February 1, 2017

Nasir and Matt discuss the suit against Apple that resultedfrom a car crashed caused by the use of FaceTime while driving. They also discuss howforeseeable use of apps can increase liability for companies. Full Podcast Transcript NASIR: Hi and welcome to Legally Sound Smart Business! I’m Nasir Pasha. MATT: And I’m Matt Staub. Two attorneys…

January 5, 2017

The guys kick in the new year by first discussing Cinnabon’s portrayal of Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia soon after her death, as well as other gaffes involving Prince and David Bowie. They alsotalk about right of publicity claims companies could be held liable for based on using someone’s name or likeness for commercial gain.

December 22, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the recent incidentat a Victoria’s Secret store where the store manager kicked out all black women after one black woman was caught shoplifting. They then each present dueling steps businesses should take when employees are accused of harassment.

December 8, 2016

Nasir and Matt return to talk about the different types of clients that may have outstanding invoices and how businesses can convert unpaid bills to getting paid.

November 10, 2016

After a long break, Nasir and Matt are back to discuss a Milwaukee frozen custard stand that is now revising it’s English only policy for employees. The guys also discuss how similar policies could be grounds for discrimination and what employers can do to revise their policies.

October 6, 2016

The guys discuss the new California law that allows actors to request the removal of their date of birth and birthdays on their IMDB page and why they think the law won’t last. They also discuss how age discrimination claims arise for business owner.

September 29, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the racial discrimination claims surroundingAirbnb and how it’s handled the situation. They also discuss some practical tips for businesses experiencing similar issues.

September 8, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss whyAmazon seller accounts are getting suspended and banned without notice and how business owners can rectify this situation through a Corrective Action Plan.

August 25, 2016

Nasir and Matt talk about the accusations surroundingfashion giant Zararipping off the designs of independent artists like Tuesday Bassen and howsmaller companies can battle the industry giants.

August 18, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss Brave Software’s ad replacing technology that has caught the eye of almost every national newspaper and has a potential copyright infringement claim looming. They also welcome digital marketing expert Matt Michaelree to speak on the specifics of what Brave is attempting to do and whether it has the answers moving forward.

July 28, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Gretchen Carlson against Fox CEO Roger Ailes. They also talk aboutthe importance of sexual harassment training and properly handling such allegations in the office.

July 15, 2016

Nasir and Matt talk about the changes at Starbucks that have led to many disgruntled employees and customers.

June 23, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the criminal charges facing FedExinvolving the alleged transportation of illegal drugs. They also talk about how business owners should address working with customers that may be breaking the law.

June 15, 2016

The guys return after a long break to discuss why Yahoo is auctioning off over 3,000 patents and how this decision will affect the longevity of the company.

May 25, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the increase in the salary thresholdfor exempt employees and how employerscan try to avoid paying overtime as a result.

May 18, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the Baltimore law that makes it very difficult to operate food trucks in the city. They also discuss all the legal restrictions tohaving a food truck.

May 11, 2016

Matt listens to Nasir recap the developing battle in his hometown of Vandalia, Ohio over whether a Dunkin Donuts can move into a location in close proximity to a local favorite donut shop. They then discusswhether the issue is more legal or personal.

May 9, 2016

The guys kick off the week by discussing a Nevada employee who is claiming she was fired for not supporting the Scientology beliefs of her employer.

April 27, 2016

The guys discuss the massive floods in Houston,how employers responded, and why one meteorologist became a local hero. They also discuss the steps businesses should take in preparing for storms outside the workplace.

April 20, 2016

The guys discuss the boycott of Amazon over the products of an unnamed presidential candidate. They also talkabout how a business should handle a boycott and whether it’s possible to exit one unscathed.

April 13, 2016

Click here to read HubSpot’s response on this topic. Nasir and Matt discuss the trend in startups to compensate programmers and other early employees with stock options and how the company culture at HubSpot isn’t what it seems.

April 6, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss various lawsuits against social media platforms in which users are accused of artificially inflating their social currency.

March 30, 2016

Nasir and Matt discuss the class action suit against Jessica Alba’s Honest Company for allegedlyselling products that contained harmful chemicals.

March 23, 2016

Nasir and Matt talk about the story out of Texas that Mexican restaurants were reportedly attempting to ban Trump supporters from eating at their restaurants.

We represent businesses.
That’s all we do.

Oh, and we love it.

We love our work. We love reviewing that lease for your new location. We thrive on closing that acquisition that nearly fell through. We’re fulfilled when we structure a business to grow, raise capital, and be legally protected.

We focus on developing close relationships with our clients by being like business partners. A partner who provides essential, personalized, proactive legal support.

We do all of this without utilizing the traditional billable hour model. You pay for the value we bring, not the time spent on calls, emails, and meetings.

Our team is made up of attorneys and staff that share these values and we are retained by clients who want the same.

Pasha Law PC operates in the states of California, Illinois, New York, and Texas.

Meet Our Team

Fractional General Counsel Services

Pasha Law Select offers the expertise of a high-end general counsel legal team for every aspect of your business at a fixed monthly rate. Pasha Law Select is deliberately designed to allow our legal team to be proactive, to anticipate, and to be comprehensive in serving our clients. To be great lawyers, we need to know our clients. We can’t know our clients unless we represent a select number of clients in the long-term. This is Pasha Law Select.

Learn More