Why don’t health clubs that restrict their membership to women run afoul of discrimination laws? Or for that matter, why don’t any clubs that restrict membership by gender violate the law?
The answer, in short, is that sometimes they do, but not always. The question involves Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as state anti-discrimination laws and requires distinguishing between public and private organizations and their health, social and business functions. But it also requires figuring out how the right of privacy applies to customers. It’s a multi-variable problem.
Private clubs that do not take certain tax exemptions and adhere to certain other laws have more freedom to choose their members. In balancing the members’ right to associate (or not to associate) with whom they choose versus the public’s right of equal access, the former wins, as long as the clubs don’t take public money. The toniest golf clubs are private in this sense.
Most clubs, however, are not private. In the eyes of the law, they are “public accommodations” that may not discriminate on the basis of gender, race, religion or other reasons. A gym’s decision not to sell memberships to men seems to be a flagrant violation of this rule. The response is usually that the goal is to protect women’s privacy.
Right to Privacy
The Supreme Court has long held that the right to privacy is implied by certain other rights explicitly outlined in the Constitution. Where the right to privacy begins and ends is perhaps the thorniest Constitutional question of the last sixty years. How it applies to health clubs is only a small part of the puzzle.
Generally, in order to justify gender discrimination in membership, gyms have to demonstrate that:
- Not excluding members of one sex would harm business operations,
- The customers’ privacy interests are entitled to protection under law, and
- No reasonable alternative exists to protect customers’ privacy rights.
It is clearly a very fact-specific argument, and the decisions do not provide a lot of helpful guidance to health club owners.
Certain states have tackled the problem legislatively. Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Tennessee and Wisconsin, for example, exempt health clubs from laws which otherwise prohibit sex discrimination in public accommodations. The laws essentially treat gyms like locker rooms or bathrooms, which have always been exempt. California has no such provision.
What About Clubs that Have Been Forced to Admit Women?
Some of the highest profile decisions lately, like that of the Augusta National Golf Club to admit women, have been economically, rather than legally driven.
Other clubs, like Rotary, Kiwanis, Jaycees and Lions have been forced by the courts to admit women on the theory that they admitted so many men that they were not actually private clubs but public accommodations. Part of the background undoubtedly had to do with the business networking function of these organizations, which arguably gives an economic advantage to members. To deny that advantage to women certainly seems to violate the spirit, if not the letter of Title VII.
March 03, 2016
The topic of teachers getting into trouble over sex-related matters has become almost a sub-genre of American journalism for several decades now. In the late 1990's, Washington schoolteacher Mary Kay Letourneau became a tabloid feature …
December 11, 2014
I once worked for a company that had been rumored, maybe, at some distant time in the future, possibly, but not certainly, perhaps in connection with a potential sale or not, to be tentatively considering …
March 05, 2015
Thinking of buying a franchise? That’s very exciting. For many, franchising is the first foray into owning your own business. As with any business purchase, however, you will want to make sure that you can …
November 27, 2014
The Texas Court of Appeals 2013 decision in Nacogdoches Heart Clinic, P.A. v. Pokala raises some puzzling questions about the direction of noncompete law in Texas. It makes sense from a public policy perspective, but …
November 05, 2015
Employee Performance Evaluation If you scan through the national newspapers you will find article after article about managers and supervisors who are agonizing over the behavior of employees. Sometimes this agony is brought about by the …
June 18, 2015
Job seekers hate credit checks. They see it as invasive data collection with only remote relevance to job performance. It has also been argued that credit checks unfairly burden those who have or have had …
October 21, 2014
If your small business is about to begin to hire its first employees, you may be puzzled about how much to pay them. If you offer too little, you won’t be able to hire who …
September 18, 2014
If you are thinking about buying a business, you must have lots of questions. Of course, you should get some help with this process -- from your banker, your attorney, your accountant, and possibly a …
October 06, 2015
While Uber may be receiving the lion’s share of the attention on the topic, there has been no shortage of court rulings, IRS audits, and labor decisions on the issue of workforce misclassification. With a …
August 17, 2015
Nasir and Matt discuss how racism led to employees getting fired and another instance where a judge overturned a decision to terminate a racist employee. Transcript: NASIR: Okay. Welcome to our podcast where we cover business in …
But keep in mind that the argument has been about the distinction between public and private; it was not about balancing the rights to equal access and privacy in public organizations.
Women have long retreated to the Ladies Room to have important conversations. What if it became a well-known convention for businesswomen to meet at the local women only gym to wheel, deal and make money?
This could conceivably come up in the context not of the gym, but of women’s business and professional organizations. At that point, courts might actually face the latter question. It would be a new match-up and may be the next contentious turn for privacy law.