Last week, a home contractor filed a lawsuit for $750,000 against a former customer for defamation. If you read the headlines across the news agencies, you read contractor filing a lawsuit against a customer for a bad review. This headline is very misleading as it implies that the only reason the contractor filing suit for the review is because it was negative–implying it has nothing to do with whether the comments were true or not.
Last Friday, a judge granted a preliminary injunction removing some of the most egregiously inaccurate (as alleged) statements from Yelp. Definitely a win for the contractor; however, the lawsuit has already resulted in some bad press for him, deepining the impact of this upset customer for even pursuing such an action; but what do you if you find an outright lie on Yelp?
What It Takes to Sue for a Lie on Yelp
Defamation is the primary cause of action that is used against someone who has lied about you or your business online. There are a number of hurdles a business will have to go through in order to win a defamation lawsuit by proving that thebusinesses customer (usually former) published a nonprivileged false statement of fact (rather than opinion) that exposes the business to hatred, contempt, ridcule or has a tendency to injure the occupation or business reputation.
Truth is always a defense to defamation. This is why no business should ever sue for merely getting a “bad review,” as that’s not only going to look poorly on the business’s reputation but will not get them far in court for a defamation claim.
Statement of Fact
This is where an online reviewer can skirt some liability by making statements of opinions instead of facts. This has a fine line. A statement of fact implies a provably false factual assertion while a statement of opinion does not. The main purpose of this distinction is to walk to the line of where freedom of speech begins and ends; however, spreading false opinions that imply the allegation of undisclosed defamatory facts as their basis is beyond free speech. Also what is of great importance is the context of the speech on how a reader may be inclined to conclude from the statements.
For example, saying that this plumber is a “thief” because he charges an arm and leg is probably more of an opinion because there is no fact to prove false since whether a plumber is expensive is subjective and an opinion; compare that to a review that says this plumber is a “thief” and so I called the cops on him–this implies he is an actual thief, a provable (or disprovable) fact.
If argued properly, an injured business could not only get an order requiring the slanderous review to be removed but also obtain damages for the harm to reputation and even specific lost business opportunities if proved accordingly.
The Actual Review on Yelp Being Sued For
Here is the review in full from AngelsList.com:
Description Of Work: Dietz Development was to perform: painting, refinish floors, electrical, plumbing and handyman work. I was instead left with damage to my home and work that had to be reaccomplished for thousands more than originally estimated.
Member comments: My home was damaged’ the “work” had to be re-accomplished; and Dietz tried to sue me for “monies due for his “work.” I won in summary judgement (meaning that his case had no merit). Despite his claims, Dietz was/is not licensed to perform work in the state of VA. Further, he invoiced me for work not even performed and also sued me for work not even performed. Today (six months later) he just showed up at my door and ‘”wanted to talk to me.” I said that I “didn’t want to talk to him,” closed the door , and called the police. (The police said his reason was that he had a “lien on my house”; however this “lien” was made null and void the day I won the case according to the court.) This is after filing my first ever police report when I found my jewelry missing and Dietz was the only one with a key. Bottom line do not put yourself through this nightmare of a contractor.
Not exactly a glowing review. Highlighted above are statements that may be considered “statements of fact” and if false could definitely lead to damages against the reviewer. Included in these highlighted statements are such that the judge found justified to order removed by the reviewer with only hearing small amount of testimony in a preliminary injunction. Notice that a majority of the comments can be construed as fact because they could be proved otherwise and it’s not a matter of opinion. Compare that to the letter grades given of straight F’s which are complete opinion.
Do Not Pay People to Write a Positive Online Review
First and foremost, posting false positive reviews and paying for it will be against the terms of service of the website. For example, back in October of this year, Yelp announced that it would start showing warnings to users when they have found businesses that have paid for reviews. A “Consumer Alert” will appear on those listings. Yelp has said they have caught people red-handed trying to buy reviews for their business and they wanted to do something about it because buying reviews not only hurts consumers, but also honest businesses who play by the rules.
Second, we can relate this to paying for false testimonials. There are a number of statutes and regulations that vary state to state regarding advertising but the FTC is controlling in this issue as there is a prohibition for “unfair and deceptive acts or practices in commerce.” There may be a fine line with giving incentives for any reviews versus paying for them as the FTC has expanded its regulation to include online reviews requiring the authors to disclose they are being paid to do so (which of course would defeat its purpose).
Dealing with A Negative False or True Customer Review
For some businesses, filing a lawsuit right away may sound good, but as we have seen it can backfire pretty quickly once people find out you are suing your former customers. As in all litigation matters, dealing with things before its a problem is of utmost importance and when does become an issue, dealing it before it escalates is imperative.
When you do get a bad review, see what you can do for the customer directly to address his or her concerns–in the long run it will make a significance difference. For some businesses, a few negative reviews here and there is the cost of doing business when you already have a bunch more positive reviews. For example, a restaurant bar and grill recorded their negative reviews and started playing them in their bathroom.
As a general rule, litigation should be a last resort. Most do not realize the expense and toll that it can play on the wallet and mind.
Why Not Just Sue Yelp?
Yelp itself is protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and cannot be held liable for these kind of acts. Section 230 grants interactive online services of all types, including news websites, blogs, forums, and listservs, broad immunity from certain types of legal liability stemming from content created by others. This immunity covers defamation and privacy claims, as well as negligence and othertort claims associated with publication. Yelp or other review sites will not lose this immunity even if they edit the content, whether for accuracy or civility, so long as the edits do not materially alter the meaning of the original content.
Former Employee Spilling the Beans Online
Besides just negative reviews from customers, former employees of businesses may get in the mix. Notwithstanding a defamation claim as discussed, non-disparagement agreements with employees are generally enforceable, but the scope and in what circumstances may be severely restricted as to how the clause is drafted but most importantly by whistle-blower statutes and general rights of freedom of speech.
Anti-SLAPP Motion: A Scary Threat to Suing Your Customers for Defamation
SLAPP stands for strategic lawsuits against public participation. It is a tool in California and some other states that can be very useful for defendants in protecting freedom of speech; without an anti-SLAPP statute, a malicious business could inflict substantial expense and hardship upon someone in retaliation for their speech, even if their claim is without merit. If done properly, such a motion shifts the burden on the plaintiff to prove that they are likely to win their case based upon the evidence provided. Losing such a motion would not only stop the lawsuit on its track but also expose the plaintiff to attorney’s fees–a scary threat to any defamation lawsuit.
If you know who the party is that posted the defamatory statement, our office may be able to help you to send a demand letter to that individual to request removal or modification. If interested, contact our office via email with the address of “yelp” followed by “@topfloorlegal.com” or use the contact form above.