Your Business Protected. Try our legal services.

Pasha Law provides comprehensive legal protection for businesses by acting as general counsel for a fixed monthly fee. We do, of course, also provide simple flat fee legal services for limited scope projects.

Whatever your business legal needs, including contract drafting or negotiation, human resource advice, intellectual property protection, or even government compliance, Pasha Law has you covered from a legal and common sense business perspective.

At our firm, we pride ourselves on digging deep into the business of our clients so we can proactively address their needs. Pasha Law focuses on striking the right balance between conservative advice and practical solutions.

Why The Monthly Fee Model?

No longer should attorneys have an incentive to create work for themselves and take as long as possible to complete a task in order to maximize their billable hours.

The focus with our model realigns the incentives between attorney and client to create a value-based relationship.

How Does The monthly fee work?
How Does the Monthly Fee Work?

Pasha Law's fixed monthly retainer provides for generally every legal need of your business. At only a phone call or email away, your business has a dedicated general counsel to deal with virtually every legal issue.

Need a contract drafted? Need to terminate an employee? There are no hidden fees and no surprise bills. There are some exceptions that are not covered under this monthly fee, such as specialty services like litigation, tax opinions, patent filings, or other out of the ordinary services (see retainer agreement for details).

There is no long term commitment. Pasha Law realigns the incentives by allowing the attorney-client relationship to terminate at any time. This means that each month we must prove the value of our services to our clients. We believe this has been key in creating the close long term relationship that we have with our clients.

Not to be confused with legal insurance, Pasha Law provides actual legal services performed by business and corporate attorneys. The monthly rate varies depending on the needs and size of the business, but the general goal is to spread out your legal costs so that you may budget for the long-term. This means that instead of paying a sizeable up-front retainer deposit, your legal fees are spread out in a monthly fee.

We accept all major credit cards and BitCoin for most services

You have diverse needs. Our Services are many.

Pasha Law handles in-house pretty much everything that your business may need legally.

Contract Agreements

Contract agreements are the soul of any transaction and we've handled many. From the simple independent contractor or vendor agreement to the more complex asset purchase agreement, we have no problem structuring the deal for you.

Employment Issues

Employment issues typically pose the biggest risk to any business. Our focus is employment compliance with finesse-not all the answers will be in the handbook, although we draft those too.

Corporate Governance

Corporate governance is not just for the owner who likes order, but also for nailing down the structure of your business with you and your partners in a way that minimizes liability.

Intellectual Property

Intellectual property is the intangible assets of your business that we aim to protect, perfect, and patent. We take care of most of these issues in-house, including trademarks and copyright filings, and setting up your business structure to make sure it is all protected.

Risk Management

Risk management requires long-term strategy with big picture reviews of your business. This is not something that most law firms can provide without developing intimate long-term relationships that we strive for with all of our clientele. Our bottom line philosophy is that litigation is almost always a losing battle, whether you win or lose.

Our firm believes in "7 C's" of quality legal services

We do well because we focus on proving our value each month.

About Pasha Law

Honesty, Hard Work & Trust.

Since 2008, Pasha Law has been protecting the needs of businesses of all sizes while staying at the forefront of the business law community. We now operate in California, Illinois, Texas, and New York. We have the unique ability and skill to handle business deals that other firms may not have the experience to touch. Pasha Law strives for exceptional outcomes while also maintaining a risk-conservative posture for our clients.
What our clients say about us:
  • This has taken such a burden off my company knowing we have Pasha Law in house.
    President of an Organic Chocolate Distribution & Retail Business
  • Having that piece of mind and knowing you are there makes my job just that little bit easier
    President of Landscaping Maintenance Company
  • Pasha Law is caring, efficient, and personal. I don't know what we would have done without them.
    President of an Insurance Brokerage
  • Pasha Law works wonders with the legal system. Inexpensive yet results driven, PL is truly one step ahead; we are happy to have them represent TLK Fusion.
    President of a leading Hollywood marketing firm in Los Angeles, California
  • Having hired nine law firms in the last three years, I can say with great certainty that Pasha Law has been the most personable and easiest to work with. They go the extra mile for clients.
    President of a Jewelry Line
  • Pasha Law always takes the time to answer my phone calls and emails.
    CEO of an Auto Financing Firm
  • Pasha Law has been a valuable asset to my company.
    President of Real Estate Brokerage
  • The main reason Pasha Law has been our first choice is due to their integrity
    COO of a Translation Service Provider
Other Articles You May Like:
  • Fox News Sexual Harassment Case Highlights the Need for Effective Sexual Harassment Policies and Procedures in the Workplace

    July 26, 2016

    Workplace sexual harassment has been grabbing headlines lately, thanks to charges filed by former “Fox & Friends” co-host Gretchen Carlson against Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes. Carlson has alleged that Ailes fired her for rebuffing his sexual advances and standing up to a sexist culture in the Fox newsroom. The Allegations The complaint, filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, contends that Ailes explicitly asked Carlson for a sexual relationship during a meeting in his office. Carlson allegedly met with Ailes to discuss concerns she had about persistent harassment in the Fox newsroom. In that meeting, he reportedly told her: “I think you and I should have had a sexual relationship a long time ago and then you’d be good and better and I’d be good and better.” According to the lawsuit, when Carlson refused Ailes’s advances, he retaliated by reducing her salary, cutting back her air... Read More

  • How Starbucks Turned Coveted Employer to Employee Complaints [e274]

    July 15, 2016

    Nasir and Matt talk about the changes at Starbucks that have led to many disgruntled employees and customers.

  • Not the Wolf of Wall Street Sequel Leonardo DiCaprio Was Expecting [e273]

    July 06, 2016

    Nasir and Matt talk about why Leonardo DiCaprio isn’t done with his work on the Wolf of Wall Street and also discuss the recent Yelp decision that businesses should be excited about. Transcript: NASIR: Welcome to our podcast where we cover business in the news and add our legal twist to that business news. My name is Nasir Pasha. MATT: And I’m Matt Staub. NASIR: Why do you always laugh at me at every intro? MATT: You always pause at a different spot. I don’t know. NASIR: It’s for dramatic effect. MATT: I notice it and no one else probably does. NASIR: Yeah. No, you’re probably right. MATT: So, there’s a story that’s been popping up and I think the actual story, I just did a quick Google search on this because I was actually trying to find out when the case initiated, 90 percent – maybe 95 percent –... Read More

  • Brexit: How the U.K.’s Withdrawal from the EU Could Impact U.S. Businesses

    June 30, 2016

    In a move that shocked the world, the U.K voted on June 23, 2016 to leave the European Union. The final vote was 52% Leave and 48% Remain, with Britain and Wales leading the charge to exit, while Scotland and Northern Ireland pushed to stay. While the impact of the vote was felt immediately, with global markets tumbling and British Prime Minister David Cameron announcing his intention to resign, the process will take much more time. The U.K. has two years to negotiate its exit from the EU. What may happen in that time is anyone’s guess. There will certainly be some turmoil on the European front, particularly in the areas of economics and immigration. The natural reaction here across the pond is to wonder how all this might affect U.S. businesses going forward. The answer is, no one really knows yet. The unprecedented vote, combined with the upcoming U.S.... Read More

  • The Legal Considerations of Allowing Telecommuting

    June 28, 2016

    Telecommuting is growing by leaps and bounds in this day and age, and it is no wonder. There are a lot of benefits to employers for allowing employees to work from anyplace they so choose. An Overview of Telecommuting Practices As I already mentioned, telecommuting is huge in this day and age. But just in case you don’t believe me, let’s look at some facts proving this. In today’s work environment, more and more companies are going completely remote. Take a look at any of these for examples: We Are Mammoth; UltraViolet; Compose; 10Up; and DuckDuckGo. In fact, Flex Jobs, which specializes in helping workers find less traditional roles, published an article listing 125 such companies. However, that is not all. In 2015, Gallup’s annual Work and Education poll found that 37% of employees say they have at some point or the other telecommuted. That number was just 9% in... Read More

  • Recent Increase in Law Firm Salaries Leads to Client Push Back, Demand For Value Billing

    June 24, 2016

    A few weeks ago, the renowned New York law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, one of the heaviest hitters in the legal industry, announced that it was raising the starting salaries of its associates. The June 6, 2016 announcement instituted $20,000 pay raises for first year associates across the board, increasing base salaries from $160,000 to $180,000 per year. Eighth year associates will now receive annual starting salaries of $315,000. Salary increases were to kick in as of July 1. The move came after Cravath associates raised the issue of base salaries at its firm town hall meetings. The leading rationale behind raising salaries was that associates had not seen increases in almost a decade, with the last round of raises coming in January 2007. The cost of living, particularly in a city like New York, has increased dramatically in that span of time, as have the cost of... Read More

  • Can a Business Be Held Liable for Crimes Committed by Clients? [e272]

    June 23, 2016

    Nasir and Matt discuss the criminal charges facing FedEx involving the alleged transportation of illegal drugs.  They also talk about how business owners should address working with customers that may be breaking the law. Transcript: NASIR: Welcome to our podcast where we cover business in the news and add our legal twist to the business news. My name is Nasir Pasha. MATT: And I’m Matt Staub. NASIR: And so, business news, right? That’s what we cover? What’s the business news that we have today? MATT: Well, it could be business or it could be legal – preferably if it’s a Venn diagram, it’s something in the middle. NASIR: That’s where we come in. MATT: Yeah, that’s what we try to cover at least. This would quality as business news even though we don’t do— NASIR: Drugs? MATT: A drug or a criminal – too much criminal law – or at least... Read More

  • What FedEx’s Misclassification Suit Teaches Us All

    June 21, 2016

    Last week, FedEx announced that it had reached a $240 million settlement in its class action suit across 20 states for misclassifying workers as independent contractor upon court approval. This, on top of a $226 million in California for the same problem, means that the package delivery service will end up paying $466 million for its failure to properly classify workers. FedEx is not the only company who has this problem. Over the last several years, many companies have had problems properly classifying workers, and as a result, a lot of money has been lost in making it right. To help, I have examined the FedEx case, as well as the laws on this topic and other companies who have found themselves on the wrong side of a classification lawsuit. Why is it so hard? What should you be doing? Is your classification system accurately reflecting the status of your... Read More

  • Court Says Cigna “Hijacked” Plan Administrator’s Role for Its Personal Benefit (Cigna v. Humble Surgical)

    June 20, 2016

    After over two years battling Cigna in its typical out-of-network fraud and fee-forgiveness protocol claims, Humble Surgical Hospital, LLC emerged victorious in a court judgement in the Southern District of Texas. Judge Hoyt blasts Cigna’s Abuse of Discretion Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt blasted Cigna in a 54-page opinion ordering the physician-owned out-of-network hospital to be paid over $13 million plus attorney’s fees. In applying the 5th Circuit’s 2015 opinion in North Cypress Medical Center v. Cigna, the Court made clear that Cigna’s interpretation of its infamous fee-forgiveness protocol plan exclusions is not only “legally incorrect” as North Cypress suggested, but also a complete abuse of discretion.  The judgement included Judge Hoyt Opinion and Order Humble Surgical not “Fee-Forgiving” Out-of-network facilities across the country have been faced with allegations that they are fee-forgiving by Cigna and other insurance carriers just because they have been unable to collect the full cost-sharing co-pay / deductible on or before the... Read More

  • Supreme Court Relaxes the Standard for Awarding Enhanced Damages in Patent Infringement Cases

    June 16, 2016

    Patent holders were recently dealt some good news by the nation’s highest court, which has lowered the standard for awarding triple damages in patent infringement cases. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the test used by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to determine whether victims of patent infringement could be awarded enhanced damages was too strict. According to the Court, the current test improperly protected some of the worst patent infringers. A unanimous court overturned the standard employed by the Federal Circuit for awarding damages under Section 284 of the Patent Act. The Act allows for enhanced damages up to three times actual damages. However, the Court held that, under the current standard, the test for proving triple damages was too difficult for patent holders to meet. Background Two separate cases were under review by the Supreme Court. In Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse... Read More

Get In Touch with us

Central Mailing Address

302 Washington St #150-6440, San Diego, CA 92103

Local Offices Located In:

San Diego, CA | Los Angeles, CA | San Francisco, CA | New York, NY | Houston, TX | Chicago, IL

All locations by appointment only.