Sarah Felong

Can They Defeat the Non-Compete?

Can they defeat the Non-Compete?

Reasonable non-compete agreements are enforceable in most states.  However, there are a few states, such as California, which do not enforce non-compete agreements in California contracts aside from specific exceptions codified under California Business and Professions Code Section 16600 et seq.

California Employees and the Non-Compete

Often times, employers with California employees will require employees to sign non-compete agreements in which the agreement is to be interpreted under the law of another state (“choice of law”) and adjudicated in the courts of that other states (“choice of forum”).

Employees have avoided the enforceability of these types of agreements by the use of forum shopping techniques.  For example, under the federal precedent known as “first to file”, an employee could avoid the enforceability of the non-compete agreement by filing in a California court, asking the California court to find the agreement unenforceable.  Assuming the employee files before the employer, the employer’s case in another state will be dismissed for reasons of judicial efficiency.  Consequentially, the de facto result of filing first in California is that California law would be followed, a thereby the non-compete agreement would be unenforceable.

Case Law Development Creates Changing Expectations

However, this practice has recently been called into question by the ruling in Meras Engineering, Inc. v. CH20, Inc.  (2013).  The facts of the case are as follows: Two California resident employees worked for a company called CH20, which was incorporated in and with a principal place of business in Washington state.  The employees’ contracts contained non-compete provisions and as well as a forum selection clauses and choice of law clause which provided that Washington law would govern and that jurisdiction and venue would be in Washington state.

The two employees proceeded to leave CH20 and being work for the competitor company of Meras.  On the same day they began this employment with Meras, the two employees along with Meras filed in Northern District of California to have the non-compete provision found unenforceable under California law.  Soon thereafter, CH20 also filed suit against the employees and Meras in Washington state court claiming that the employment agreement and non-compete provision therein was subject to Washington state law.  The case was removed to federal court and the employees and Meras then moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that the applicable California law rendered the non-compete agreement unenforceable.  Meras by itself then filed a motion to stay the California proceeding pending the outcome of the Washington case.  To the disappointment of Meras, the California case was dismissed with prejudice, with the court citing that the contractual forum selection clause would be enforceable, making the contract subject to Washington law.

California Public Policy

Therefore, although the employees and Meras argued that the enforceability of the forum-selection clause would violate California public policy, the California court ultimately disagreed.  The California plaintiffs’ argument was that because the Washington court had ruled that Washington law applied, the Washington court would likely find the non-compete agreement to be enforceable.  Therefore, if the California case were to be dismissed, the California plaintiffs would essentially have no chance of prevailing.  The Court did not find this argument persuasive and concluded that finding a forum selection clause unenforceable merely because its enforcement would result of the application laws that would be unfavorable to the plaintiffs did not amount to result which would be against California public policy.

  • Nine Legal Strategies to Protect Your Brand

    June 25, 2015

    Perhaps you’re never dreamed of a Google or Facebook-sized business empire – multiple products generating multiple streams of income that seem to semi-magically renew themselves. Something a bit more modest might be fine as well. Whatever …

  • 10 Tips to Prevent Business Litigation

    September 24, 2015

    An ounce of prevention, as they say, is really just sound business practice. Litigation can be ruinously expensive and may force a business into liquidation. Even a “win” can devour the time and energy you need to …

  • Can You Get Fired For Being Racist? [e215]

    August 17, 2015

    Nasir and Matt discuss how racism led to employees getting fired and another instance where a judge overturned a decision to terminate a racist employee. Transcript: NASIR: Okay. Welcome to our podcast where we cover business in …

  • The Cost of Converting Independent Contractors to Employees

    October 06, 2015

    While Uber may be receiving the lion’s share of the attention on the topic, there has been no shortage of court rulings, IRS audits, and labor decisions on the issue of workforce misclassification. With a …

  • 6 Habits of Business Owners That Will Get Them Sued

    February 10, 2015

    There are some clients that I know, no matter what advice we give, no matter what we do, they are bound to enter into the courtroom. It is as if they are destined without any …

  • Erotic Data on Employee Smartphones: What Can an Employer Do?

    March 03, 2016

    The topic of teachers getting into trouble over sex-related matters has become almost a sub-genre of American journalism for several decades now. In the late 1990's, Washington schoolteacher Mary Kay Letourneau became a tabloid feature …

  • Can An Employer Be Held Liable For An Employee's Facebook Post? [e259]

    March 14, 2016

    The guys kick off the week by discussing the lawsuit in Hawaii where an employee posted a defamatory remark about a customer and tried to hold the employer liable. They also discuss the new anti-discrimination and …

  • How Ambassadors Can Ruin Your Brand and How to Deal With Disasters

    January 21, 2016

    The name brand ambassador says it all. Similar to an ambassador for a foreign country, the goal of that person is to represent the brand in a positive light and bring consumers closer to the …

  • Diversity, Employment Discrimination and Inclusion

    September 17, 2015

    Diversity in the workplace, a totally laudable goal, is actually harder to achieve than many employers appreciate, and ill-conceived or badly executed efforts can actually make things worse, opening the door to legal liability.  To …

  • Is PTO Enough When Paid Sick Leave Is Required?

    January 19, 2016

    Look around your office. Is anyone out sick today? (Alternatively, is someone who is in the office clearly too sick to be there?) According to Bloomberg BNA, sick leave will be a big issue for …

Take Away

California courts will not take into account the substantive effects of enforcing a non-compete agreement when deciding whether or not the forum selection clause in a non-compete agreement is contrary to California public policy.

The finding in the Meras case should put employers on notice to carefully consider and formulate forum selection clauses in employment contracts.  Employers and employees should necessarily surmise that California courts will never enforce out of state non-compete agreements.

Read More